Extract key testimony Deposition transcriptTrial transcript
Admissions & Key Testimony Extractor
Pull every admission, damaging concession, and 'I don't know' on your key issues out of a transcript — with verbatim Q&A and page:line cites.
By practice
AI prompts for prosecution practitioners
Proving each element, corroborating across independent sources, and staying ahead of disclosure obligations. Every prompt below assembles with this practice's emphasis already composed in — pick a workflow and fill in the case details.
Your workflows
Find contradictions Mixed / full case record
Stress-test your witnesses before the defense does Find the inconsistencies now, with the same rigor you'd apply to theirs.
Open in the builder →
Extract key testimony Deposition transcript
Inventory defense witness concessions Element-relevant agreements and admissions, verbatim and cited.
Open in the builder →
Summarize the record Deposition transcript
Page-line summary for the trial notebook Sequential, exhibit-tracked, with the ten excerpts that matter ranked.
Open in the builder →
Draft from the record Mixed / full case record
Outline the defense witness exam from the record Element-driven sequences that anticipate the defense themes the file suggests.
Open in the builder →
Interrogate the file Mixed / full case record
Cited, disclosure-aware Q&A on the case file Answers note material bearing on disclosure review as they go.
Open in the builder →
How prosecution practitioners should brief an AI
- Extract key testimony
- Prioritize corroboration across independent sources, spontaneous statements, and testimony establishing each element — and separately flag anything arguably favorable to the defense for disclosure review.
- Build a chronology
- Build the timeline that the converging sources support, and explicitly flag gaps or sequence ambiguities a defense could exploit, rather than smoothing them.
- Find contradictions
- Identify inconsistencies in defense accounts, and with equal rigor flag weaknesses and inconsistencies among the State's own witnesses before the defense finds them.
- Summarize the record
- Organize by charge and element, rating the strength of proof per element as resting on multiple independent sources, a single source, or inference.
- Draft from the record
- Build examinations that establish elements through specifics and anticipate the defense themes the record itself suggests.
- Interrogate the file
- In every answer, note material that bears on disclosure obligations, and keep proof and inference visibly separate.
The full library, through this lens
Every template below opens with the Prosecution emphasis composed into its example.
Draft from the record Mixed / full case record
Deposition Outline from the Record
Build an examination outline straight from the existing record: goals to lock in, exhibits keyed to questions, and sequences that end in commitment.
Find contradictions Mixed / full case recordExpert report
Expert Report vs. Deposition Audit
Audit an expert's deposition against their report: new opinions, abandoned opinions, changed bases, and undisclosed reliance materials — exclusion-motion fuel.
Summarize the record Deposition transcriptTrial transcript
Page-Line Deposition Summary
The classic page-line summary, done right: topic-segmented, admission-flagged, exhibit-tracked, with a ranked excerpt list at the end.
Find contradictions Mixed / full case recordDeposition transcript
Prior Statement Cross-Examination Builder
Align a witness's deposition against every prior statement, classify each conflict, and get a lock-in → confrontation cross sequence with dual cites.
Interrogate the file Mixed / full case recordDeposition transcriptMedical recordsDiscovery responses
Record Interrogation Session Setup
The standing-rules prompt: paste this once at the start of a chat session and every answer after it comes cited, sourced, and honest about gaps.
Build a chronology Medical records
Treatment Chronology Builder
Turn a medical records production into a dated treatment chronology with gaps, pre-existing references, and verbatim causation statements — every entry cited.
A good prompt is an assignment memo.
You already know how to brief an associate. The CITE method is that same skill, pointed at an AI — read the full method, then take the prompt pack with you.
Building legal software? See what's coming for developers.