Skip to content
CasePrompts

For developers · Coming soon

Your users shouldn't have to learn prompting.

A drop-in widget that rides inside the AI chat your product already has — it asks two questions your product already knows the answers to, and hands your AI an expert litigation prompt instead of "summarize this."

Concept one — the chat widget (not a live product)

The widget rides inside your existing AI feature. Your product already knows the practice area and the document type — the widget turns those two facts plus a one-tap workflow into a complete CITE-method prompt, delivered to your code rather than your user's clipboard. Your users get "no prompting needed"; your AI feature performs like it was briefed by counsel.

Concept two — case dashboard builder (not a live product)

Same library, bigger canvas. Your product picks a panel set per matter type once — then every case gets a dashboard whose panels are CITE workflows your AI keeps filled as documents land, with the citation discipline intact in every cell.

Each panel is a library workflow — the same vetted prompts on this site — run by your AI against the matter's documents and re-run as the record grows. Your users never write a prompt; they open the case and the record has already been worked, with a cite on every line.

Concepts three & four (not live products)

Same library, two more doors: one for the moment before anyone asks, and one for the user who insists on typing their own prompt anyway.

Auto-briefing

0 prompts written

A document lands; the right workflow has already run. Configure the panel set once per matter type — when a transcript or production arrives, your AI works it before anyone opens the file.

The purest version of "no prompting needed": nobody prompts at all.

Prompt upgrade

CITE Coach inline

For the user who types their own ask anyway: the coach spots a weak briefing in your chat box and offers the assignment-memo version — one click, before it ever reaches your model.

Powered by the same CITE Coach that grades prompts on this site — your product gets the credit for better answers.

Every legal tool is bolting on AI chat right now — and watching users type "summarize this" at a 400-page transcript, get a mediocre answer, and blame the product. The model was never the problem. The briefing was.

Behind the widget sits the same maintained library this site runs on: practice-aware, citation-disciplined prompt content — task × document × practice lens × citation convention — written and reviewed by litigation support professionals, and deliberately vendor- and model-neutral. When a convention changes or a new practice area lands, the library updates; your product doesn't.

Early access

We'll reach out before the beta opens — no newsletter, no drip campaign.