Extract key testimony Deposition transcriptTrial transcript
Admissions & Key Testimony Extractor
Pull every admission, damaging concession, and 'I don't know' on your key issues out of a transcript — with verbatim Q&A and page:line cites.
By practice
AI prompts for civil / insurance defense practitioners
Evaluating exposure, testing causation, and developing comparative fault and mitigation — often with carrier reporting in mind. Every prompt below assembles with this practice's emphasis already composed in — pick a workflow and fill in the case details.
Your workflows
Build a chronology Medical records
Comb the medicals: gaps, prior claims, compliance Treatment gaps, missed appointments, and every prior-claim reference, cited.
Open in the builder →
Extract key testimony Deposition transcript
Lock in what the plaintiff conceded at depo Comparative fault, prior injuries, and activity admissions — verbatim Q&A.
Open in the builder →
Find contradictions Mixed / full case record
Recorded statement vs. deposition: track the drift Classified divergences with dual cites, ready for cross.
Open in the builder →
Summarize the record Deposition transcript
Carrier-ready page-line summary Topic-segmented, admission-flagged, exhibits tracked.
Open in the builder →
Find contradictions Mixed / full case record
Audit plaintiff's expert against their report Disclosure gaps and methodology concessions, for attorney evaluation.
Open in the builder →
Interrogate the file Mixed / full case record
Interrogate the claim file with citations Proves-vs-alleges discipline enforced on every answer.
Open in the builder →
How civil / insurance defense practitioners should brief an AI
- Extract key testimony
- Prioritize plaintiff admissions bearing on comparative fault, prior injuries or claims, gaps and lapses in treatment, activities inconsistent with claimed limitations, and mitigation.
- Build a chronology
- Flag treatment gaps, missed or cancelled appointments, non-compliance notes, prior or subsequent injuries to the same body parts, and every reference anywhere in the records to prior claims, accidents, or litigation.
- Find contradictions
- Focus on locking the plaintiff and treating providers into the claimed mechanism and limitations, and on divergence between reported symptoms and documented activity or imaging.
- Summarize the record
- Organize around exposure: what currently supports each element of the claim, what undercuts it, and what remains unproven on this record — in a neutral, evaluative register suitable for carrier reporting.
- Draft from the record
- Maintain a neutral, evaluative tone appropriate for carrier reporting; keep established facts and the plaintiff's contentions visibly separate throughout.
- Interrogate the file
- In every answer, distinguish what the record proves from what the plaintiff merely alleges, and say which it is.
The full library, through this lens
Every template below opens with the Civil / insurance defense emphasis composed into its example.
Draft from the record Mixed / full case recordMedical records
Demand Letter Facts Section
Draft the facts and damages narrative of a demand from the record itself — every sentence cite-backed, gaps flagged instead of papered over.
Draft from the record Mixed / full case record
Deposition Outline from the Record
Build an examination outline straight from the existing record: goals to lock in, exhibits keyed to questions, and sequences that end in commitment.
Find contradictions Mixed / full case recordExpert report
Expert Report vs. Deposition Audit
Audit an expert's deposition against their report: new opinions, abandoned opinions, changed bases, and undisclosed reliance materials — exclusion-motion fuel.
Summarize the record Deposition transcriptTrial transcript
Page-Line Deposition Summary
The classic page-line summary, done right: topic-segmented, admission-flagged, exhibit-tracked, with a ranked excerpt list at the end.
Find contradictions Mixed / full case recordDeposition transcript
Prior Statement Cross-Examination Builder
Align a witness's deposition against every prior statement, classify each conflict, and get a lock-in → confrontation cross sequence with dual cites.
Interrogate the file Mixed / full case recordDeposition transcriptMedical recordsDiscovery responses
Record Interrogation Session Setup
The standing-rules prompt: paste this once at the start of a chat session and every answer after it comes cited, sourced, and honest about gaps.
Build a chronology Medical records
Treatment Chronology Builder
Turn a medical records production into a dated treatment chronology with gaps, pre-existing references, and verbatim causation statements — every entry cited.
A good prompt is an assignment memo.
You already know how to brief an associate. The CITE method is that same skill, pointed at an AI — read the full method, then take the prompt pack with you.
Building legal software? See what's coming for developers.