For Filevine
Litigation prompt structures for Filevine
Filevine documents AI review features that operate on selected project documents and support built-in or custom prompts. These templates give that review a narrower assignment and a consistent output to verify.
Product-source review: . Capabilities and data terms vary by plan and can change. Confirm the current product documentation and your organization’s approval before using case material.
Filevine for litigation — product fit and limits
Strengths
- AI Doc Review works with documents selected from a Filevine project.
- Filevine documents built-in prompts as well as custom AI document prompts that organizations can save and reuse.
- Keeping review inside the case-management workflow may reduce duplicate document movement, subject to the organization’s configuration.
Watch-outs
- The workflow requires Filevine access and depends on documents being available and processed in the project.
- Generated answers and source references still require comparison with the underlying document.
- Feature access, permissions, and organization-wide prompt sharing depend on current Filevine settings.
This is an editorial product comparison, not an endorsement or a security assessment.
Using CasePrompts with Filevine
Use this with FilevineAI's document Q&A on the linked project documents. For live depositions, adapt the INSTRUCTIONS block into Depo CoPilot goals before the proceeding rather than pasting the whole prompt.
Tool interfaces change — adapt as needed, and check your firm's AI use policy before uploading case materials.
Why structure helps more than “summarize this”
Every prompt is built on the CITE method — Context, Instructions, Template, Evidence. It states who is doing the review, what source is in scope, the exact task, the requested output, and how to identify supporting locations. That structure can make an answer easier to inspect, but it cannot keep a model from inventing or misreading material. Check every material output against the source.
Prompts to try in Filevine
All templates →Admissions & Key Testimony Extractor
Pull every admission, damaging concession, and 'I don't know' on your key issues out of a transcript — with verbatim Q&A and page:line cites.
Prior Statement Cross-Examination Builder
Align a witness's deposition against every prior statement, classify each conflict, and get a lock-in → confrontation cross sequence with dual cites.
AI Medical Chronology Prompt for Lawyers
Build a date-ordered medical chronology from the complete record, with source citations for every encounter and explicit flags for treatment gaps, prior history, causation language, and missing records.
AI Page-Line Deposition Summary Prompt
Turn a complete deposition transcript into a topic-based page-line summary with precise cites, verbatim excerpts, admissions, exhibits, and unanswered questions.
Record Interrogation Session Setup
The standing-rules prompt: paste this once at the start of a chat session and every answer after it comes cited, sourced, and honest about gaps.
Expert Report vs. Deposition Audit
Audit an expert's deposition against their report: new opinions, abandoned opinions, changed bases, and undisclosed reliance materials — exclusion-motion fuel.
CasePrompts is vendor-neutral and built local-first — the builder runs in your browser and never sees your case files. See how your data is handled → Know which tier of tool your firm has approved before uploading case materials to Filevine.
Official product sources
These first-party pages supported the capability and data-term statements above when reviewed on .